Algebraic Analysis notes Lecture 5 (16 Jan 2019)

Notes for Lecture 4

Last time: Hard Lefschetz gives an orthogonal decomposition H^k(X, \mathbb C) = \bigoplus_{2r \leq k}^\bot \eta^r H_{prim}^{k-2r} (X; \mathbb C) with respect to a Hermitian form on H^k (X, \mathbb C) defined using the Poincare pairing.

On the other hand, Hodge theory gives a decomposition H^k (X; \mathbb C) = \bigoplus_{p+q = k}^\bot H^{p,q} (X). So H^k (X; \mathbb C) has an orthogonal decomposition into pieces coming from H^{p,q}_{prim} = H^k_{prim} (X; \mathbb C) \cap H^{p,q} (X).

Hodge-Riemann bilinear relations: The form (-1)^{\frac{k(k+1)}{2}} i^{p-q} \mathbb H_k is positive definite on H^{p,q}_{prim}.

Products: Fundamental group (or higher homotopy groups) we have \pi_1 (X \times Y) \cong \pi_1(X) \times \pi_1(Y). (Co)homology is harder.

Kunneth Formula: for k a field, H^* (X \times Y; k) \cong H^*(X; k) \otimes H^*(Y; k).

Locally products: A fibre bundle consists of a total space E, a base space B, a fibre F, and a map p \colon E \rightarrow B, such that for any point x in the base B, there is a neighborhood U of x and a homeomorphism such that the following diagram commutes

Question: what is the relationship between H^*(E) and H^*(B) and H^* (F)?

Example: S^3 is fibred over S^2 with fibre S^1. Think of S^3 as \{(z_0, z_1) \in \mathbb C^2 \mid |z_0|^2 + |z_1|^2 = 1\} and S^2 = \mathbb C \cup \{ \infty \}. Define a map S^3 \to S^2 by (z_0, z_1) \mapsto z_0/z_1. This is called the Hopf fibration.

H^*(S^1) = \mathbb Z, \mathbb Z, 0, 0, \dots
H^*(S^2) = \mathbb Z, 0, \mathbb Z, 0, \dots
H^*(S^3) = \mathbb Z, 0, 0, \mathbb Z, \dots

Then we can draw H^p (S^2) \otimes H^q (S^1) in a grid, spectral sequence

If we take sums along diagonals, i.e. \bigoplus_{p+q=i} H^p(S^2) \otimes H^q(S^1), we get \mathbb Z, \mathbb Z, \mathbb Z, \mathbb Z, 0, \dots, but this isn’t exactly the same as H^*(S^3).

Answer [Leray-Serre]: If B is simply-connected, then there is a spectral sequence E_2^{p,q} = H^p (B; k) \otimes H^q (F; k) \Rightarrow E_\infty^{p+q} = H^{p+q} (E; k).

Roughly, H^*(E) is built out of H^*(B) \otimes H^*(F) “after some cancellations”. The differential cancels out \mathbb Zs on the next page of the spectral sequence:

the arrow indicates the differential, which cancels out those copies of Z

Theorem [Deligne-Blanchard]: Let f \colon E \to B be a family of smooth projective varieties. Then the Leray-Serre spectral sequence degenerates at E_2! There is no cancellation. (Thanks to Daniel Litt for pointing out on Twitter that this is only true for cohomology with coefficients in a field of characteristic 0!)

So H^i (E) \cong \bigoplus_{p+q = i} H^p(B) \otimes H^q (F) for B simply-connected.

The theory of intersection cohomology and perverse sheaves gives a way to simultaneously generalize all of this! Poincare duality, weak & hard Lefschetz, and Hodge-Riemann bilinear relations, intersection cohomology will tell us that some modification of these theorems hold for any projective algebraic variety (not necessarily smooth), and a vast generalization of Deligne’s theorem to arbitrary proper algebraic maps f \colon X \to Y.

To do this we’ll need the theory of sheaves and homological algebra and category theory!

Presheaves

Let X be a topological space. Let Op(X) denote the category with open sets of X for objects and inclusions for morphisms. For a ring k, a presheaf of k-modules on X is a functor F \colon Op(X)^{op} \to k-mod. A morphism of presheaves f \colon F \to G is a natural transformation. We write PreSh(X; k) for the category of presheaves.

Let’s unpack this definition. F is a rule which assigns to each open subset U of X a k-module F(U), and to each inclusion U \subseteq V a homomorphism of k-modules res_{U,V} \colon F(V) \to F(U), called “restriction”. \alpha \in F(U) is called a section of F over U. Notice that functoriality gives res_{U,U} = id_{F(U)}, and if $U \subseteq V \subseteq W$ then res_{W,U} = res_{V,U} \circ res_{W,V}.

A morphism f \colon F \to G is a collection of k-module homomorphisms f_U \colon F(U) \to G(U) for each U open in X, such that if U is a subset of V, then the following commutes:

I used superscripts to distinguish the two restriction maps, but I don’t know if this is standard

If s is an element of F(V), and U is a subset of V, sometimes we write res_{U,V} (s) = s|_U.

Example: Let M be a k-module. The constant presheaf on X with value M, denoted \underline{M}_{pre} or \underline{M}_{pre, X}, is given by \underline{M}_{pre}(U) = M for all U open in X, and res_{U,V} = id_M for all inclusions U \subset V.

We’ll have to continue with sheaves next time.

Notes for Lecture 6

Published by Joe Moeller

Mathematician

2 thoughts on “Algebraic Analysis notes Lecture 5 (16 Jan 2019)

Leave a comment