Algebraic Analysis notes Lecture 9 (30 Jan 2019)

Notes for lecture 8

Last time we showed that Sh(X;k) is an abelian category. So we’ll get:

  • a notion of simple objects
  • complexes, exactness, cohomology of complexes
  • 5-lemma
  • snake lemma
  • Jordan-Holder theorem for abelian categories of finite length

For \phi \colon F \to G, we saw ker (\phi)_x \cong ker (\phi_x) and cok (\phi)_x \cong cok (\phi_x).

Corollary: A sequence 0 \to F \to G \to H \to 0 in Sh(X;k) is exact iff 0 \to F_x \to G_x \to H_x \to 0 is exact for any point x in X.

In particular, we can check if \phi is injective/surjective by checking if \phi_x is injective/surjective for all points x in X.

Lemma: \phi \colon F \to G is injective iff \phi(U) \colon F(U) \to G(U) is injective.

Surjectivity is more complicated!

Lemma: \phi : F \to G is surjective iff for any U open in X and t \in G(U), there is an open cover (U_\alpha)_{\alpha \in I} of U such that for any \alpha \in I, t|_{U_\alpha} is in the image of \phi_{U_\alpha}.

In particular, if \phi_U is surjective for any U open in X, then \phi is surjective, but the converse is not necessarily true.

Lemma: A sequence of sheaves 0 \to F \to G \to H is exact iff 0 \to F(U) \to G(U) \to H(U) is exact.

proof: If 0 \to F \to G \to H is exact, then F(U) \to G(U) is injective. If F(U) \to G(U) \to H(U) failed to be exact for some open U in X, then F(U) \to ker(G(U) \to H(U)) would be an isomorphism. Then F \to ker \psi would not be an isomorphism. Contradiction.

Functors between abelian categories

Definition: If A and B are additive categories, and F : A \to B is a functor, we say F is additive if for any objects x,y in A, the map \mathrm{Hom}_A (x, y) \to \mathrm{Hom}_B (Fx, Fy) is a group homomorphism.

Definition: If A and B are abelian categories, we say F is exact if for any short exact sequence 0 \to x \xrightarrow{\phi} y \xrightarrow{\psi} z \to 0 in A, then 0 \to Fx \xrightarrow{F\phi} Fy \xrightarrow{F\psi} Fz \to 0 is exact in B. F is called left exact if 0 \to x \to y \to z exact implies 0 \to Fx \to Fy \to Fz exact. F is called right exact if x \to y \to z \to 0 exact implies 0 \to Fx \to Fy \to Fz \to 0 exact.

Exact functors can be computed inductively. But to compute left/right exact functors, we need homological algebra.

Example/Exercise: Let C be an abelian category, and Y and object in C. We get two functors: \mathrm{Hom}_C (Y, -) : C \to Ab and \mathrm{Hom}_C (-, Y) : C^{op} \to Ab. These are both left exact.

When \mathrm{Hom}_C (Y, -) is exact, then we say that Y is projective, and if \mathrm{Hom}_C (-, Y) is exact, we say that Y is injective.

Definition: Let F \in Sh(X; k). Then module of global sections of F, denoted \Gamma(F), is the k-module \Gamma(F) = F(X). The module of global sections with compact support, \Gamma_c(F), is the k-module \Gamma_c(F) = \{ s \in F(X) \mid supp(s) \text{ is compact} \}.

Proposition: The functors \Gamma : Sh(X; k) \to k-mod and \Gamma_c : Sh(X; k) \to k-mod are both left exact.

proof: \Gamma is left exact by the previous lemma. Consider 0 \to F \xrightarrow{\phi} G \xrightarrow{\psi} H exact.

Since this diagram commutes:

then \Gamma_c \phi is injective. If s \in \Gamma_c G is in the kernel of \Gamma_c G \to \Gamma_c H, then there is a t \in \Gamma F such that \phi(x)(t) = s. Then for any point x in X, \phi_x (t_x) = s_x, but each \phi_x is injective. Then supp(t) = supp(s), which is compact, so t is compactly supported, t \in \Gamma_c F.

Let f : X \to Y be a continuous map of topological spaces. Consider the induced map f_* : Sh(X; k) \to Sh(Y; k) given by f_*F(U) = F(f^{1}U). Check that this is indeed a sheaf on Y. Also, given a map of sheaves on X \phi : F \to G, For any U open in Y, \phi induces a map f_* F (U) \to F_* G(U), and f_* is a functor.

Examples:

  • Let Y={o}, and f : X \to \{o\}. Then f_* F(Y) = F(X) = \Gamma F (this is the simplest example of sheaf pushforward)
  • if i : M \hookrightarrow N is a closed embedding, then i_*(F)(U) = F(U \cap M), called the “extension of F by zero”

Notes for lecture 10

Published by Joe Moeller

Mathematician

2 thoughts on “Algebraic Analysis notes Lecture 9 (30 Jan 2019)

Leave a comment