Algebraic Analysis notes Lecture 11 (4 Feb 2019)

Notes for lecture 10

Last time: for an abelian category A, C(A) is the category of complexes in A. Say f, g \in \mathrm{Hom}_{C(A)} (X, Y) are homotopic, f~g, if there are maps s^i : X^i \to Y^i such that f^i -g^i = d_Y s + sd_X.

Definition The homotopy category K(A) of A is the category with objects complexes of A, and morphisms are homotopy classes of morphisms of complexes. The motivation for this is from algebraic topology, where there is a homotopy category of topological spaces, hTop, where the objects are topological spaces and the morphisms are homotopy classes of continuous maps.

Example Singular cochains gives a functor hTop \to K(\mathbb Z-mod).

Let Hom^n (X^\bullet, Y^\bullet) = \prod_{\mathbb Z} Hom(X^i, Y^i). Note that the squares formed by an element of this set do not necessarily have to commute. Then we get a complex Hom^\bullet (X^\bullet, Y^\bullet). Let d^n (( \phi^i)_{i \in \mathbb Z}) = (d_Y^{i+n} \phi^i - (-1)^n \phi^{i+1} d_X^i. Note that for \phi \in Hom^0 (X, Y), \phi is in the kernel of d^0 iff d_Y \phi = \phi d_X iff f~0. Thus Hom_{K(A)} ( X^\bullet, Y^\bullet) \cong H^0 (Hom^\bullet (X^\bullet, Y^\bullet).

We also defined the mapping cone C(f) \in C(A) for a map f : X^\bullet \to Y^\bullet.

Proposition/Exercise For a map of complexes f : X^\bullet \to Y^\bullet in A, the following are equivalent:

  1. f~0
  2. f factors through the canonical map i : X \to C(1_X)
  3. f factors through the canonical map p [-1] : C(1_Y) [-1] \to Y
  4. the sequence 0 \to Y \to C(f) \to X [1] \to 0 splits

Corollary If f,g : X^\bullet \to Y^\bullet and f~g, then f^* = g^* : H^i(X) \to H^i(Y) for each i. Hence, we get well-defined cohomology functors, K(A) \to A where X \mapsto H^i(X).

proof If f~0, then f factors through C(1_X) which is acyclic!

Corollary Every homotopy equivalence (i.e. isomorphism in K(A)) is a quasi-isomorphism.

Note that K(A) (nor the derived category D(A), as we will see) is an abelian category! It is a triangulated category.

Lemma Given f : X^\bullet \to Y^\bullet a map of complexes in A, we get the sequence

The composite of any two consecutive maps is zero in K(A).

proof The composite of Y \to C(f) \to X[1] is zero on the nose. For X \to Y \to C(f), then

So i \circ f factors through i_X, so i \circ f ~0. Similar for C(f) \to A[1] \to B[1].

Definition A triangle in an additive category with a shift funcor [1] is a sequence A \xrightarrow{f} B \xrightarrow{g} C \xrightarrow{h} A[1] \to \dots, such that is the long sequence, any two consecutive maps compose to zero.

So X \to Y \to C(f) \to A[1] is a triangle in K(A).

A morphism of triangles is a commutative diagram:

In K(A), a standard triangle is one of the form X \xrightarrow{f} Y \to C(f) \to X[1]. An exact triangle in K(A) is one that is isomorphic to a standard triangle.

Proposition Exact triangles satisfy:

  1. for any map f : X \to Y there is an exact triangle X \to Y \to Z \to X[1] and X \xrightarrow{1_X} X  \to 0 \to X[1] is an exact triangle
  2. If X \to Y \to Z \to X[1] is an exact triangle, so are its rotations Y \to Z \to X[1] \to Y[1] and Z[-1] \to X \to Y \to Z
  3. Direct sum of exact triangles is exact
  4. Given two exact triangles A \to B \to C \to A[1], and A' \to B' \to C' \to A'[1], and morphisms h_A :A \to A' and h_B : B \to B' such that the square commutes, then there exists a map h_c : C \to C' making this collection of maps a map of triangles

Published by Joe Moeller

Mathematician

3 thoughts on “Algebraic Analysis notes Lecture 11 (4 Feb 2019)

Leave a reply to John Baez Cancel reply